Games * Design * Art * Culture |
![]() Paranoia Paranoia Blog Manifesto Docs Investor 1-Pager Information for Development Partners Electronic Press Kit My Other Websites Personal site SPI Compendium Manhattan Address Locator NYC Game Companies Heroes of the Revolution Apus Software Big Time Games Jonathan Blow Sean Breslin Caravel Games ChronX Cornutopia Digital Eel Enkord Ethereal Darkness GameLab Game Tunnel Garage Games Guardians of Kelthas Hanako Games Health Media Lab IGF IHobo Impending Studios Inhuman Games Iocaine Studios IR Gurus Kellogg Creek Killer Bee Korpos Jetro Lauha Large Animal The Llama Pad Mekensleep Meridian 59 Metanet Metanet Moonpod Mousechief NOKs Nucleosys Oddlabs Parallax Factory Pedestrian Entertainment Persuasive Games PlayFirst Pocket Watch Games Positech Rampant Games Reflexive Rusty Axe Science of Tomorrow Short Hike Sillysoft Skotos Sociolotron Spider Web Software Sports Mogul SuperFurious A Tale in the Desert TameStorm Games Ten Tons Themis Group Third Wave Games Tiny Mantis Three Melons Three Rings Urban Squall Wahoo Studios WishboneX Game Design Stuff Chris Crawford Raph Koster "Mahk" LeBlanc's rants MUD-Dev List Storybuilders Eric Zimmerman Friends' Blogs Rich Carlson Cory Doctorow Gary Farber P & TNH Eric Raymond Dave Rickey Scott Rosenberg Developers' Blogs Kipper's Mighty Pen GameDevBlog Scott Miller Phil Steinmeyer Raph Koster Intelligent Artifice Zen of Design Games Are Art MakeItBigInGames Xemu's Ramblings Tamed Tornado Jeux Sans Frontieres Hideo Blog Jeff Freeman Only a Game Psychochild Game Studies Blogs Terra Nova Avant Game Grand Text Auto Ludonauts Jesper Juul Jill.txt King Lud IC Memory Card Mirjam Eladhari Water Cooler Games Other Interesting Game Blogs Buzzcut Curmudgeon Gamer Jason Della Rocca Videogame Media Watch Game Politics Game Girl Advance Play No Evil VCs Worth Reading Jeff Bussgang Jason Caplain Mike Hirschland Steve Jurvetson Raj Kapoor Seth Levine Ross Mayfield Allen Morgan Charles O'Donnell Tim Oren Fred Wilson Organizations DiGRA GAMA IGDA ESA MEF Preserving Game History Computerspiele Museum Lowood @ Stanford Moby Games Classic Software Preservation Proj. Digital Game Archive Electronics Conservancy The Underdogs Musee Suisse de Jeu The Liman Collection Musee Mechanique |
Friday, September 15, 2006
Games are Not Fruit (and Why Gametap is Evil)
Fruit goes bad. If you leave fruit on the shelf at the grocer's too long, eventually it turns brown and shrivels up, and you have to throw it away. So maybe as it starts to get ripe you cut the price--99 cents a pound instead of $2.99. It's got a "sell by" date. The conventional game industry treats games like fruit. A typical game has an on-sale window of 2 weeks, and is going to sell 80% of its volume during that period anyway. So after a month, you discount it from $49.99 to $39.99. And another month later to $29.99. And by the end of the year, it's in the discount bin at $9.99. The online retailers, by contrast, mostly have a single, fixed price for all titles: $19.99. And it never changes. That's what you pay at Yahoo! Games or RealArcade or Big Fish for everything. Reflexive is a little more flexible; some of their titles are $14.99. But that's it--and it's not dependent on age. Swarm is eight years old, and still retailing for $19.99. (And worth it, in my opinion.) My belief is that's as it should be. The value of a game has--well, not nothing to to with its age, because, say, there's not a lot of point in buying a game that only runs under DOS today. And I'm not at all sure I'd want to buy the original Civ, at this point, either (though a great game it was); I'd want the most recent version. But in general, a game is a game, and it surely doesn't lose 80% of its value in the course of a year. The disparity in how the conventional and online markets treat games came home to me as we were constructing the Manifesto site; Flatspace II retails for $24, while eXtinction sells for $10. Flatspace II is not overpriced, btw; it's a game I like a lot. Although if it were up to me instead of the developer, I'd price it at $20, since that's the standard price for downloadable games. And the two are certainly not directly comparable games; Flatspace is an Elite-style title, while eXtinction is a platform shooter. But eXtinction is certainly as good a game as many others available online for $20--and a priori, it's mysterious why it should be priced so low. From my perspective, too, it's not good that it's priced so low, because I look at things very differently from a conventional publisher. A conventional publisher looks at a title like that and says, "It's old, if I can get even ten bucks for it, great." I look at it and say, "It's a 50MB installer. If I have a conversion rate of 1%, I've got 5 gigs of data traffic, which costs me a buck, per sale. At ten bucks, that's a big chunk of my margin." Flatspace II is a 10 meg installer. Guess which one I'd rather push? Back last winter, when I first embarked on this venture, I went to Finland for what's likely to be the last time in a while. When I had still been at Nokia, I'd agreed to lecture at the University of Art and Design in Helsinki. While I was there, I met with Kai Backman, the creator of Short Hike, a space station simulator (and a 2004 IGF finalist--he's now decided to turn it into an open source project). He's been selling versions of Short Hike online for years, and told me that every month, he got sales off versions of the demo that were three or more years old. The point is: The lifetime of a game online is vastly longer than the conventional market is used to, because the conventional market has been peculiarly warped by the dynamics of retail. Why is eXtinction $10 and Flatspace II $24? Because eXtinction was published by Merscom, which is primarily a conventional retail publisher, dealing with us mainly in hope of finding some aftermarket for a title that they think is past its sell-by date. For them, $10 is gravy off something that's old, and not going to generate much, if any, revenue from here on in. Flatspace II is by Cornutopia, a classic indie developer used to an online environment. They know that games are not fruit. They see no reason to drop the price--because there is none, in their retail framework. Now mind you, Merscom is probably selling boxes of eXtinction in stores somewhere (more probably the UK than the US--I don't think it ever got a US retail release, although I could be wrong). And they're probably selling them for six quid or something. And it would be absurd to charge more online for the game than the price for the game in a box. (This is all hypothetical, on my part--for all I know, we're the only source for the game remaining today.) In general, I look at the prices set by our partners who are steeped in the conventional retail culture--Merscom and Strategy First, mainly (and I'm not criticizing them, I'm glad to have their product and support)--and say: I understand why you are pricing games this way. But as you move to an online retail environment, you have to learn that the rules are different. Games are not fruit; they do not spoil. The conventional market pricing for games is absurd; $60 is too damn high. For anything. I do buy games at retail for $40 and up--but only when I am absotively posilutely convinced that I (or one of my kids) will adore it. Something by Sid Meier, or Paradox works for me; a high-profile Japanese RPG, or a Zelda title, and I know my daughters will eat it up. But at those prices, I take no chances. $20. This is a good price. Twenty bucks I don't spend without thinking, but if I like something, it's not going to deter me either. Ten bucks? In general, that is not good pricing. If someone wants a game, they will pay twenty. (And if they do not, they will pay nothing.) If you price it at ten, you are gambling that you will sell more than double the units you'll sell at twenty--but games are not fungible products. It's not like buying flour, where it's basically all the same, and you might as well go for the cheaper brand. These are not impulse sales. If it's worth ten bucks, it's worth twenty. Now, there are exceptions. We're selling The Shivah for $5. It is very retro in graphical style--and Dave Gilbert was offering it as freeware up until recently. True, the version we offer, unlike the freeware one, has music and professional voice acting--but still, it was freeware, so there's a limit to how much you can charge. I understand why he went for five. I think that's too low, actually--but I wouldn't want to price it at twenty. The point is this, though. As game sales move online, we have to stop thinking of games like fruit. Games don't spoil. ==================== I was about to end the post here, but I think I won't. I'll go off on a diatribe. Milder than my usual sort, I hope. But not likely to make me any friends either. Doubtless I should learn to hold my tongue. Let us consider GameTap. And similar ventures, like the reincarnation of Infinium. For $9.95, GameTap offers you free, unlimited play, of its entire catalog of games. This is a good deal, by the way. Go and sign up for it, while it lasts, if you have any interest in playing games more than a year or two old. But. It is a VERY. BAD. MODEL. If this model triumphs, we are ALL DOOMED. Not just my venture; any hope of a creative and vital game industry in the years to come. Here's why. How do the publishers and developers of the games that GameTap offer make any money? Well, GameTap takes some portion of the subscription revenue they receive, and they apportion it to the providers of the games they offer on the basis of usage. So if, say, you are a GameTap subscriber, and spend a dozen hours in a month playing Civ III or something, Firaxis gets some money from you, indirectly. A few cents, I imagine. In other words, GameTap is a venture based on the premise that games are fruit. Publishers are willing to license older product to them, because they view that product as having no real value otherwise. They are licensing games that are past their sell-by date. Anything they can make past that date is gravy. A few cents is okay. This is great for gamers--today. But not so great if this becomes the prevailing model. For PC games in particular, I believe, ESD is the future. Gamestop says that 6% of their sales derive from PC games. Shelf space devoted to PC games is declining year by year. If PC games are to survive, they are going to have to move online. Today, there are, in essence, two competing models for how they are going to do so. One is the application sale model, which we are of course pursuing--and so are the casual game portals, and so is Steam, and so is Direct2Drive, all with our different takes on what that means and how it should happen. And whichever one of us has the better idea doesn't really matter, from the perspective of the health of the PC game market; someone is going to build a viable path to market for PC games independent of brick-and-mortar retail, and developers are going to be able to make reasonable livings developing games for PCs, if any one of us (or some smarter competitor) makes it happen. But if brick-and-mortar retail for PC games evaporates, as I think it will, and all PC game developers are left with is GameTap--then all you can make is pennies. I don't actually think that will happen; I think GameTap is fundamentally screwed, because they are dependent on PC game publishers continuing to treat games like fruit--and the only reason to do so is if your primary channel is conventional retail. But that's why I look at GameTap and think "bad idea." Not necessarily bad business idea--but a bad idea, if you're concerned about the health of developers, and the market as a whole. Games do have value. And games are not fruit. People should pay for games. Not outrageously, and yes, I think $60 is outrageous. But some reasonable sum. Like, say... Twenty bucks. Ten dollars a month for everything? Idunno. I don't see how you can make that work for developers. And if you can't make it work for developers, you don't have a sustainable value chain. 21 Comments:you're mistaken about the gametap business model. some of the details are incorrect. By , at 11:29 AM I think you have it backwards... I'm looking at GameTap and thinking of signing up, but I think this is the future -- and salvation -- of PC gaming. You state yourself that you're not willing to shell out $50 for a game when good games can be had for $20. But $20 games are not as heavily developed -- "polished" -- as $50 games. So $50 games are doomed -- except on a subscriber based service like Gametap, which could eventually release brand new games to its subscriber base, spreading the cost out on all who "give it a try". By , at 10:02 AM
Games aren't fruit, but software just doesn't last. By , at 6:04 PM This post has been removed by the author.
If people don't buy a $50 game at retail, waiting instead for it to drop in price, or they buy the game used either in the same store or online, then you've got the same conundrum online that you're talking about happening in retail: I'll buy a game for $6 at Half-Price Books that I would strongly debate buying at $10 and would probably refuse to buy outright if it were $20. With enough patience, most games can be had inexpensively. So why would I buy a game online for $20 when similar titles can be found in realspace for $6?
If you don't understand the gravitational wow powerleveling of an MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game:wow power leveling), I'm going to enlighten you with just a dozen words about world of warcraft power leveling: you get to pick what you look like and what your talents are in world of warcraft powerleveling.
China Tours and Yangtze Cruises A professional China travel agency offering private & group package tours, tailor-made vacations for families, couples and individual travelers, Yangtze cruises, hotel & ticket booking services. By , at 1:34 AM runescape money runescape gold runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape gold runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold runescape accounts buy runescape accounts runescape lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money ??? ???? ????? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ???? ??????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???????? ????? ??? By , at 1:33 AM
runescape money runescape gold runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape gold runescape money runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold runescape accounts buy runescape accounts runescape lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro goldrunescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money Tabula Rasa Credit By , at 3:25 AM
wow power leveling By wow power leveling, at 10:36 PM
wow power leveling By wow power leveling, at 10:38 PM
runescape money runescape gold Louis vuitton replica replica handbags powerleveling power leveling wow powerleveling wow power leveling world of warcraft power leveling world of warcraft powerleveling
Trying to be impressive!deeply wonderful here!
lotro gold By lotro gold, at 11:22 AM
Trying to be impressive!deeply wonderful here! wow gold cheap wow gold buy wow gold world of warcraft gold wow world of warcraft wow gold WoW Warrior WoW Hunter WoW Rogue WoW Paladin WoW Shaman WoW Priest WoW Mage WoW Druid WoW Warlock power leveling powerleveling wow power leveling wow powerleveling wow guides wow tips google?? google???? google???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ?? LED? ?? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? powerlin518 logo design website design web design ???? By runescapemoney, at 4:16 AM
Trying to be impressive!deeply wonderful here!
How to Play Roulette Online By Roger David, at 10:07 PM
Trying to be impressive!deeply wonderful here!
Trying to be impressive!deeply wonderful here!
Roulette Sniper Review By Roger David, at 2:13 AM
Everything here is solely and entirely my personal opinion, and should not be construed as representing the
opinions of my employer, my ex, my cats, or any other person or entity in this universe or any other.
Any resemblance between my opinions and the opinions of others, living or dead, is purely
coincidental, unless it's the product of a vast, left- or right-wing conspiracy. Oh, and I'm not going to
bother with a Creative Commons thingie, but feel free to use anything here however you like, so long as
you ascribe my words to me. And a link would be nice.
|